|
August 15, 2005
Last modified August 15, 2005 - 1:26 pm
Oh baby: Infants among those caught up in 'no-fly' confusion
By LESLIE MILLER Associated Press
WASHINGTON -- Infants have been stopped from boarding planes at
airports throughout the U.S. because their names are the same as or
similar to those of possible terrorists on the government's "no-fly
list."
It sounds like a joke, but it's not funny to parents who miss
flights while scrambling to have babies' passports and other documents
faxed.
Ingrid Sanden's 1-year-old daughter was stopped in Phoenix before boarding a flight home to Washington at Thanksgiving.
"I completely understand the war on
terrorism, and I completely understand people wanting to be safe when
they fly," Sanden said. "But focusing the target a little bit is
probably a better use of resources."
The government's lists of people who are either barred from
flying or require extra scrutiny before being allowed to board
airplanes grew markedly since the Sept. 11 attacks. Critics including
the American Civil Liberties Union say the government doesn't provide
enough information about the people on the lists, so innocent
passengers can be caught up in the security sweep if they happen to
have the same name as someone on the lists.
That can happen even if the person happens to be an infant like
Sanden's daughter. (Children under 2 don't need tickets but Sanden
purchased one for her daughter to ensure she had a seat.)
"It was bizarre," Sanden said. "I was hugely pregnant, and I was like, 'We look really threatening."'
Sarah Zapolsky and her husband had a similar experience last
month while departing from Dulles International Airport outside
Washington. An airline ticket agent told them their 11-month-old son
was on the government list.
They were able to board their flight after ticket agents took a half-hour to fax her son's passport and fill out paperwork.
"I understand that security is important," Zapolsky said. "But
if they're just guessing, and we have to give up our passport to prove
that our 11-month-old is not a terrorist, it's a waste of their time."
Well-known people like Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Rep. John Lewis,
D-Ga., and David Nelson, who starred in the sitcom "The Adventures of
Ozzie and Harriet," also have been stopped at airports because their
names match those on the lists.
The government has sought to improve its process for checking
passengers since the Sept. 11 attacks. The first attempt was scuttled
because of fears the government would have access to too much personal
information. A new version, called Secure Flight, is being crafted.
But for now, airlines still have the duty to check passengers'
names against those supplied by the government. That job has become
more difficult -- since the 2001 attacks the lists have swelled from a
dozen or so names to more than 100,000 names, according to people in
the aviation industry who are familiar with the issue. They asked not
to be identified by name because the exact number is restricted
information.
Not all those names are accompanied by biographical information
that can more closely identify the suspected terrorists. That can
create problems for people who reserve flights under such names as "T
Kennedy" or "David Nelson."
ACLU lawyer Tim Sparapani said the problem of babies stopped by
the no-fly list illustrates some of the reasons the lists don't work.
"There's no oversight over the names," Sparapani said. "We know
names are added hastily, and when you have a name-based system you
don't focus on solid intelligence leads. You focus on names that are
similar to those that might be suspicious."
The Transportation Security Administration, which administers
the lists, instructs airlines not to deny boarding to children under 12
-- or select them for extra security checks -- even if their names
match those on a list.
But it happens anyway. Debby McElroy, president of the Regional
Airline Association, said: "Our information indicates it happens at
every major airport."
The TSA has a "passenger ombudsman" who will investigate
individual claims from passengers who say they are mistakenly on the
lists. TSA spokeswoman Yolanda Clark said 89 children have submitted
their names to the ombudsman. Of those, 14 are under the age of 2.
If the ombudsman determines an individual should not be
stopped, additional information on that person is included on the list
so he or she is not stopped the next time they fly.
Clark said even with the problems the lists are essential to keeping airline passengers safe.
Copyright © 2005 Associated Press. All rights
reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or
redistributed.
Copyright © The Billings Gazette, a division of Lee Enterprises.
|